-0.6%
Furnishings and household equipment spending, August 2026, month on month, seasonally adjusted
+4.9%
The same series through the year to August 2026, seventh of nine categories
$14.8m
How much July's level was revised down between the July and August releases
4 of 6
Recent months whose month-on-month figure was revised down in one release
August, as it stands today
Spending on furnishings and household equipment was $5,549.9 million in August 2026, seasonally adjusted and in current prices, down 0.6 per cent on July and up 4.9 per cent on August 2025. Total household spending was flat on the month and up 6.8 per cent on the year, so furnishings grew more slowly than household spending as a whole.
Against the nine categories the indicator publishes, furnishings was seventh on the annual measure. Transport led at 10.4 per cent, recreation and culture 8.5, miscellaneous goods and services 7.3, hotels cafes and restaurants 6.9, the total 6.8, food 5.9, then furnishings 4.9, clothing and footwear 4.8, health 3.5, and alcohol and tobacco 2.7.
The part we had not checked before
These monthly figures get revised, and we had been quoting them as though they were fixed. So we downloaded the previous release of the same table and put the two side by side. Same series, same seasonal adjustment, two consecutive vintages.
Furnishings and household equipment, seasonally adjusted, as published in two consecutive releases
| Month | July release | August release | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2026 | -0.3% | -0.4% | -0.1 |
| Mar 2026 | +1.6% | +1.6% | no change |
| Apr 2026 | +0.0% | +0.0% | no change |
| May 2026 | +0.8% | +0.7% | -0.1 |
| Jun 2026 | +0.6% | +0.5% | -0.1 |
| Jul 2026 | +0.4% | +0.3% | -0.1 |
Four of the six were revised down, and the three most recent were revised down consecutively. None was revised up.
On the dollar level the pattern is sharper
Percentages round, so the levels show it better. The further back the month, the smaller the revision.
Same series, dollar level, seasonally adjusted, $ millions
| Month | July release | August release | Revision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2026 | 5,499.4 | 5,498.4 | -1.0 |
| May 2026 | 5,542.6 | 5,538.3 | -4.3 |
| Jun 2026 | 5,575.1 | 5,566.5 | -8.6 |
| Jul 2026 | 5,598.0 | 5,583.2 | -14.8 |
Four months in a row, each revised down by more than the one before it. That is a shape rather than a coincidence, and it is the shape you would expect if the most recent month is built on the least complete data. We are describing it, not explaining it: the ABS does not publish a reason for any individual revision.
This caught us, and we are saying so
Our own window coverings by the numbers quotes July at plus 0.4 per cent. That was the published figure when we wrote it. It is now plus 0.3. The story was not wrong and we are not correcting it, because the number it cites is the number the ABS had published. It is a live demonstration of the thing this piece is about: a figure quoted from this series carries the vintage it was read in, and ours did not say so. It will from now on.
What the indicator still cannot tell you
Two limits worth holding onto, both from the ABS's own methodology.
It is card data. The indicator is built from
aggregated, de-identified bank card transactions data provided to the ABS from
participating banks
, along with supermarket transactions and new vehicle sales. It is a
measure of card spending rather than of all spending.
It stops at the division. The indicator covers
9 out of the 13 major Classification of Individual Consumption According to Purpose (COICOP)
Divisions
, and the ones it leaves out are named: rent and other dwelling services,
electricity gas and other fuels, communication services, education services, and insurance and
other financial services. Within the nine, furnishings and household equipment is published as
a single line. There is no window coverings series inside it, so a blind or
shutter business reading this number is reading a division it shares with furniture, appliances
and kitchenware. That is the same measurement gap we traced in
the index that was discontinued in 2011,
arrived at from the spending side rather than the price side.
Sources
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, Monthly Household Spending Indicator, reference period August 2026, released 29 September 2026, cited at its dated monthly URL rather than the ABS latest-release page, which always serves the newest month: the August figures for total household spending, flat on the month and up 6.8 per cent on the year.
- ABS 5682.0, table 2, Estimates of Household Spending by COICOP, August 2026 release (workbook
5682002.xlsxdownloaded and read 1 October 2026): the current seasonally adjusted Furnishings and household equipment figures, series A130200506K for the level, A130200508R for the month-on-month change and A130200510A for the through-the-year change, and the through-the-year figures for all nine categories used in the ranking. - ABS 5682.0, table 2, July 2026 release (the previous vintage of the same workbook, downloaded and read 1 October 2026): the earlier published values for the same three series, which are the July release column in both tables above.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, Monthly Household Spending Indicator methodology, August 2026 (read 1 October 2026): that the indicator is built from aggregated de-identified bank card transactions data from participating banks together with supermarket transactions and new vehicle sales data; that outputs cover 9 of the 13 major COICOP divisions; and the named list of excluded divisions.
How we did this. Both workbooks were downloaded from the ABS and read directly with the series identifiers recorded above, rather than taken from the release page's summary tables, because the page's own tables are laid out beside each other and a scraped reading of them can misalign a header with a value. The revision columns are our arithmetic: each is the August release value minus the July release value for the same month and the same series, and nothing else has been adjusted. The ranking of the nine categories is the published through-the-year figures sorted, not a calculation. Where the ABS methodology is quoted it sits in quotation marks and each quotation was checked to appear in a single block of that page. We have not contacted the ABS, and no reason is offered for any individual revision because none is published.
Reading this series differently, or watching a figure move that we have not? Tell us and we will check it against the ABS workbooks and log the outcome.